CRITERIA 2
Criterion 2 – Teaching- Learning and Evaluation
2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile
2.1.1. Average Enrolment percentage (During the year)
2.1.2. Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC,ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the year ( exclusive ofsupernumerary seats)
2.2. Catering to Student Diversity
2.2.1. The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organizes special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners
2.2.2. Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)
2.3. Teaching- Learning Process
2.3.1. Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem-solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences
2.3.2. Teachers use ICT-enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning
2.3.3. Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year )
2.3.4 Ratio of students to mentor for academic and other related issues during the year
2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
2.4.1. Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the year
2.4.2. Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D. / LL.D during the year (consideronly highest degree for count)
2.4.3. Average teaching experience of full time teachers (Data for the latest completedacademic year in number of years)
2.4.4: Measures taken by the institution for faculty retention
2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms
2.5.1 Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode. Write description within 200 words.
2.5.2. Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is transparent, time-bound and efficient
2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes